Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 1964·No. D. D. No. 50·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We overrule tbe objections of tbe respondent and approve tbe recommendation of tbe board that tbe re[450]*450spondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this state, on the basis of Columbus Bar Assn. v. Agee (1964), 175 Ohio St., 443.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs except as to the penalty, which should be a public reprimand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 (Ohio 1964).

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.