Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 29, 1964

DocketD. D. No. 50

StatusPublished

This text of 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jurus, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We overrule tbe objections of tbe respondent and approve tbe recommendation of tbe board that tbe re[450]*450spondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this state, on the basis of Columbus Bar Assn. v. Agee (1964), 175 Ohio St., 443.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs except as to the penalty, which should be a public reprimand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We overrule tbe objections of tbe respondent and approve tbe recommendation of tbe board that tbe re[450]*450spondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this state, on the basis of Columbus Bar Assn. v. Agee (1964), 175 Ohio St., 443.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs except as to the penalty, which should be a public reprimand.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-jurus-ohio-1964.