Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Fishman

102 Ohio St. 3d 1213
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 9, 2004
DocketNo. 2002-1101
StatusPublished

This text of 102 Ohio St. 3d 1213 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Fishman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Fishman, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1213 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Andrew Martin Fishman, Attorney Registration No. 0031290, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 26, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Fishman, 98 Ohio St.3d 172, 2002-Ohio-7086, 781 N.E.2d 204.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Fishman
2002 Ohio 7086 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Ohio St. 3d 1213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-fishman-ohio-2004.