Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing

588 N.E.2d 783, 63 Ohio St. 3d 377, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 652
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1767
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 588 N.E.2d 783 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing, 588 N.E.2d 783, 63 Ohio St. 3d 377, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 652 (Ohio 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Charles W. Ewing is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. We suspend the execution of this discipline on condition that Ewing not be found in violation of any Disciplinary Rule for three years. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Okuley (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 3225 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2021)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Pheils
2011 Ohio 2906 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
1999 Ohio 156 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
712 N.E.2d 1246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ewing
1998 Ohio 286 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Ewing
1996 Ohio 317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 N.E.2d 783, 63 Ohio St. 3d 377, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-ewing-ohio-1992.