Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing

588 N.E.2d 783, 63 Ohio St. 3d 377, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 652
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1992·No. No. 91-1767·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Charles W. Ewing is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. We suspend the execution of this discipline on condition that Ewing not be found in violation of any Disciplinary Rule for three years. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing, 588 N.E.2d 783, 63 Ohio St. 3d 377, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 652 (Ohio 1992).

588 N.E.2d 783 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Okuley (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 3225 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2021)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Pheils
2011 Ohio 2906 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
1999 Ohio 156 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
712 N.E.2d 1246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ewing
1998 Ohio 286 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Ewing
1996 Ohio 317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)