Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Emerson

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Emerson

704 N.E.2d 238, 84 Ohio St. 3d 375
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 13, 1999·No. No. 98-1744·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s pattern of neglect and misrepresentation coupled with his cavalier attitude towards the disciplinary proceedings establishes his present unfitness to practice law in Ohio. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Emerson, 704 N.E.2d 238, 84 Ohio St. 3d 375 (Ohio 1999).

704 N.E.2d 238 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Emerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Tomson
2013 Ohio 2154 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ranke
2011 Ohio 4730 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Supreme Court of Ohio v. Bertche (In Re Bertsche)
261 B.R. 436 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)
In Re Gooch
250 B.R. 887 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)
Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Glatki
2000 Ohio 354 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Hayes
1999 Ohio 375 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)