Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Elsass

689 N.E.2d 46, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Elsass. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Ohio St. 3d 195
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 1998·No. 97-1651·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Tobias H. Elsass, a.k.a. Tobias Harold Elsass, on December 9,1997, of an application for reinstatement to the practice of law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the application for reinstatement of respondent be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Elsass, 689 N.E.2d 46, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 394 (Ohio 1998).

689 N.E.2d 46 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Elsass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.