Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dickinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dickinson

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 18, 1962

DocketD. D. No. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dickinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dickinson, 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291 (Ohio 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court, from a consideration of the record, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its recommendation. Therefore, the objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Collier and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Collier, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court, from a consideration of the record, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its recommendation. Therefore, the objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Collier and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Collier, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-dickinson-ohio-1962.