Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Brown

476 N.E.2d 654, 16 Ohio St. 3d 29, 16 Ohio B. 409, 1985 Ohio LEXIS 293
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 1985·No. D.D. No. 84-41·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this case, and inasmuch as respondent was properly served but filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and (6) and DR 9-102(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Brown, 476 N.E.2d 654, 16 Ohio St. 3d 29, 16 Ohio B. 409, 1985 Ohio LEXIS 293 (Ohio 1985).

476 N.E.2d 654 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
1998 Ohio 303 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)