Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Bailey

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Bailey

736 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1437

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 13, 2000

Docket00-977

StatusPublished

This text of 736 N.E.2d 900 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Bailey, 736 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of movant’s motion for an order to show cause why the respondent should not be punished for contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law and respondent’s response to the order to show cause,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondent is found in contempt and ordered to appear before the Columbus Bar Association with the subpoenaed documents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of movant’s motion for an order to show cause why the respondent should not be punished for contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law and respondent’s response to the order to show cause,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondent is found in contempt and ordered to appear before the Columbus Bar Association with the subpoenaed documents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-bailey-ohio-2000.