Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

607 N.E.2d 8, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1207
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 Ohio St. 3d 32
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 20, 1993·No. No. 91-2502·Published

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christopher J. Baer, Attorney Registration No. 0010166.

The court coming now to consider its order of June 17, 1992, suspending respondent, Christopher J. Baer, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c) (now Rule V[6][B]), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A) (formerly Rule V[24]). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Christopher J. Baer be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

For earlier case, see (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 32, 591 N.E.2d 1209.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer, 607 N.E.2d 8, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1207 (Ohio 1993).

607 N.E.2d 8 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer
591 N.E.2d 1209 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)