Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Amos

405 N.E.2d 271, 62 Ohio St. 2d 256, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 287, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 732
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 1980·No. D.D. No. 80-4·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), DR 7-102(A)(5), (6) and (8) and DR 9-102 (A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

In view of the foregoing, respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Amos, 405 N.E.2d 271, 62 Ohio St. 2d 256, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 287, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 732 (Ohio 1980).

405 N.E.2d 271 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Welty
729 S.W.2d 594 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross
478 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)
Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Green
438 N.E.2d 406 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1982)