Columbian Correspondence College v. Cortelyou

200 U.S. 615, 26 S. Ct. 758, 50 L. Ed. 621, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1507
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 26, 1906
DocketNo. 242
StatusPublished

This text of 200 U.S. 615 (Columbian Correspondence College v. Cortelyou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbian Correspondence College v. Cortelyou, 200 U.S. 615, 26 S. Ct. 758, 50 L. Ed. 621, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1507 (1906).

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

Per Curiam.

Mr. Arthur A. Birhey and Mr.' Charles A. Ray for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellees.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. South Carolina v. Seymour, 153 U. S. 353, 357; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280, 286; Code District of Columbia, § 233.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lynch
137 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 1890)
South Carolina v. Seymour
153 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 U.S. 615, 26 S. Ct. 758, 50 L. Ed. 621, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbian-correspondence-college-v-cortelyou-scotus-1906.