Columbian Correspondence College v. Cortelyou

200 U.S. 615, 26 S. Ct. 758, 50 L. Ed. 621, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1507
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 26, 1906·No. No. 242·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

Per Curiam.

Mr. Arthur A. Birhey and Mr.' Charles A. Ray for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellees.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. South Carolina v. Seymour, 153 U. S. 353, 357; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280, 286; Code District of Columbia, § 233.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbian Correspondence College v. Cortelyou, 200 U.S. 615, 26 S. Ct. 758, 50 L. Ed. 621, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1507 (1906).

200 U.S. 615 (Columbian Correspondence College v. Cortelyou) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lynch
137 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 1890)
South Carolina v. Seymour
153 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1894)