Columbia Rolling Mill Co. v. Beckett Foundry & Machine Co.
31 A. 770, 56 N.J.L. 714, 27 Vroom 714, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 32
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Columbia Rolling Mill Co. v. Beckett Foundry & Machine Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 N.J.L. 391 →
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
[715]*715For affirmance—The Chancellor, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith. 10.
For reversal—Rone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Columbia Rolling Mill Co. v. Beckett Foundry & Machine Co., 31 A. 770, 56 N.J.L. 714, 27 Vroom 714, 1894 N.J. LEXIS 32 (N.J. 1894).
31 A. 770 (Columbia Rolling Mill Co. v. Beckett Foundry & Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.