Columbia Insurance v. Artale

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Columbia Insurance v. Artale

168 A. 304, 114 N.J. Eq. 268, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 906

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 27, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 168 A. 304 (Columbia Insurance v. Artale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbia Insurance v. Artale, 168 A. 304, 114 N.J. Eq. 268, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 906 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion below.

We express no opinion upon the propriety of the award to appellant' Lieblich, of a lien on the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises, for attorney’s services rendered to his co-appellants, Emanuel Artale and Mamie Artale. The latter have not raised the. question, and it is therefore not before us.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI