Columbia Drug Co. v. Reid

123 S.E. 269, 158 Ga. 375, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 158
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1924·No. No. 4231·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Tlie court did not err in granting a temporary injunction, as prayed. The sole assignment of error was on that judgment. Other-issues raised in the pleadings were not adjudicated by the trial court, and are not now for decision by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. The court passed an order temporarily enjoining the prosecution of the suit in the city court of Savannah, and error was assigned upon that judgment. O’Byrne, Hartridge, Wright & Brennan, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence & Abrahams, H. W. Johnson, Bouhan & Herzog, and G. W. Owens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbia Drug Co. v. Reid, 123 S.E. 269, 158 Ga. 375, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 158 (Ga. 1924).

123 S.E. 269 (Columbia Drug Co. v. Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broderick v. Reid
139 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)