Columbia Drug Co. v. Reid

123 S.E. 269, 158 Ga. 375, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1924
DocketNo. 4231
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 S.E. 269 (Columbia Drug Co. v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbia Drug Co. v. Reid, 123 S.E. 269, 158 Ga. 375, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 158 (Ga. 1924).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Tlie court did not err in granting a temporary injunction, as prayed. The sole assignment of error was on that judgment. Other-issues raised in the pleadings were not adjudicated by the trial court, and are not now for decision by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. The court passed an order temporarily enjoining the prosecution of the suit in the city court of Savannah, and error was assigned upon that judgment. O’Byrne, Hartridge, Wright & Brennan, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence & Abrahams, H. W. Johnson, Bouhan & Herzog, and G. W. Owens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broderick v. Reid
139 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 269, 158 Ga. 375, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbia-drug-co-v-reid-ga-1924.