Colton Mercantile Co. v. Duff
This text of 39 P. 280 (Colton Mercantile Co. v. Duff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Upon the hearing the purported statement of facts was stricken from the record, leaving for our consideration only the question of the sufficiency of the pleadings. It is claimed on the part of appellants that they have raised the question of the sufficiency of the complaint in their brief, but we are unable to find anything therein which sufficiently challenges the complaint to authorize us to enter into an investigation as to its sufficiency. See Francioli v. Brue, 4 Wash. 124 (29 Pac. 928).
The judgment will be affirmed.
Scott, Anders, Dunbar and Gordon, JJ-, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 P. 280, 11 Wash. 35, 1895 Wash. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colton-mercantile-co-v-duff-wash-1895.