Colton Mercantile Co. v. Duff

Washington Supreme Court

Colton Mercantile Co. v. Duff

39 P. 280, 11 Wash. 35, 1895 Wash. LEXIS 249

Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 1895·No. No. 1542·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Upon the hearing the purported statement of facts was stricken from the record, leaving for our consideration only the question of the sufficiency of the pleadings. It is claimed on the part of appellants that they have raised the question of the sufficiency of the complaint in their brief, but we are unable to find anything therein which sufficiently challenges the complaint to authorize us to enter into an investigation as to its sufficiency. See Francioli v. Brue, 4 Wash. 124 (29 Pac. 928).

The judgment will be affirmed.

Scott, Anders, Dunbar and Gordon, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Upon the hearing the purported statement of facts was stricken from the record, leaving for our consideration only the question of the sufficiency of the pleadings. It is claimed on the part of appellants that they have raised the question of the sufficiency of the complaint in their brief, but we are unable to find anything therein which sufficiently challenges the complaint to authorize us to enter into an investigation as to its sufficiency. See Francioli v. Brue, 4 Wash. 124 (29 Pac. 928).

The judgment will be affirmed.

Scott, Anders, Dunbar and Gordon, JJ-, concur.

Colton Mercantile Co. v. Duff, 39 P. 280, 11 Wash. 35, 1895 Wash. LEXIS 249 (Wash. 1895).

Pincite

39 P. 280 (Colton Mercantile Co. v. Duff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related