Coltin v. Town of Londonderry
This text of Coltin v. Town of Londonderry (Coltin v. Town of Londonderry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 99-1849
DAVID H. COLTIN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
TOWN OF LONDONDERRY; CHRISTOPHER CHILDS; WILLIAM R. HART JR.; ETHEL COLTIN; FRANCIS RAPISARDI,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
David H. Coltin on brief pro se. Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for appellees.
SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 Per Curiam. Plaintiff Coltin appeals from a summary
judgment dismissing all claims in his complaint on the
merits. The complaint asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. §
1983, as well as state law claims of false arrest and
malicious prosecution. Upon de novo review of the judgment
in light of the parties' briefs and appendix materials, we
affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the
district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion of May
5, 1999, and in the order denying reconsideration of June 9,
1999.
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coltin v. Town of Londonderry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coltin-v-town-of-londonderry-ca1-2000.