Colten v. Kentucky
405 U.S. 913, 92 S. Ct. 933
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Colten v. Kentucky. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 U.S. 104 →
Opinion
Appeal from Ct. App. Ky. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 404 U. S. 1014.] Motion of M. Curran Clem, Esquire, for leave to permit Robert W. Willmott, Jr., Esquire, to argue orally pro hac vice on behalf of appellee granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colten v. Kentucky, 405 U.S. 913, 92 S. Ct. 933 (1972).
405 U.S. 913 (Colten v. Kentucky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.