Colson v. State
746 So. 2d 465, 22 Fla. L. Weekly 1611, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1997 WL 363001
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Colson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 717 So. 2d 554 →
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentences. Because this court lacks the authority to review the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for case reassignment, we are precluded from reaching the substantive issues raised. Wild v. Dozier, 672 So.2d 16, 18 (Fla.1996); Green v. State, 694 So.2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colson v. State, 746 So. 2d 465, 22 Fla. L. Weekly 1611, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1997 WL 363001 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
746 So. 2d 465 (Colson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wild v. Dozier
672 So. 2d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Green v. State
694 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)