Colquitt v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.
This text of 91 S.E. 70 (Colquitt v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action for damages against a street-car company. The petition contained but one count. A lump sum was claimed as damages, (a) for refusal of a conductor of a car at a transfer point to allow the plaintiff to get on his car; (6) for refusal of the conductor of a second car to accept as fare transfer-tickets that had been duly issued by the conductor of another car, and requiring payment of a cash fare; (c) for carrying plaintiff beyond his destination. Held, that the petition was subject to a special - demurrer on the ground that there was an attempt to join several distinct causes of action in one count. Seifert v. Sheppard, 111 Ga. 814 (35 S. E. 673) ; Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Ry. Co. v. Austin, 122 Ga. 823 (50 S. E. 983); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Prior, 142 Ga. 536 (83 S. E. 117) ; Orr v. Cooledge, 117 Ga. 195, 205 (43 S. E. 527).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 70, 146 Ga. 249, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colquitt-v-georgia-railway-power-co-ga-1916.