Colosimo v. Rosenstock
15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12081
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1962
StatusPublished
This text of 15 A.D.2d 663 (Colosimo v. Rosenstock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Colosimo v. Rosenstock, 15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).
Opinion
In our opinion, the record presents triable issues of fact which may not be resolved upon a motion for summary judgment. (Seman v. Harran, 15 A D 2d 506; Mapp v. Kipperman, 12 A D 2d 958; Block v. Acerra, 12 A D 2d 525; Mandell v. Field, 11 A D 2d 1074.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colosimo-v-rosenstock-nyappdiv-1962.