Colorado v. State

42 So. 3d 342, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12213, 2010 WL 3269228
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 2010
Docket5D09-576
StatusPublished

This text of 42 So. 3d 342 (Colorado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colorado v. State, 42 So. 3d 342, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12213, 2010 WL 3269228 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction. Salonka v. State, 42 So.3d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Based upon the State’s proper concession, we remand the judgment with instructions that the trial judge correct the judgment to conform to his oral pronouncement to impose costs and fines by civil judgment and not as a special condition of probation.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salonko v. State
42 So. 3d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 So. 3d 342, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12213, 2010 WL 3269228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colorado-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.