Colorado v. State

42 So. 3d 342, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12213, 2010 WL 3269228
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2010·No. 5D09-576·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction. Salonka v. State, 42 So.3d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Based upon the State’s proper concession, we remand the judgment with instructions that the trial judge correct the judgment to conform to his oral pronouncement to impose costs and fines by civil judgment and not as a special condition of probation.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colorado v. State, 42 So. 3d 342, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12213, 2010 WL 3269228 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

42 So. 3d 342 (Colorado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salonko v. State
42 So. 3d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)