Colorado Dept. of State v. Baca
This text of 591 U.S. 655 (Colorado Dept. of State v. Baca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 591 U. S. ____ (2020) 1
Per Curiam
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________
No. 19–518 _________________
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PETITIONER v. MICHEAL BACA, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT [July 6, 2020]
PER CURIAM. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ___.
It is so ordered.
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR took no part in the decision of this case.
JUSTICE THOMAS concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ___.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 U.S. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colorado-dept-of-state-v-baca-scotus-2020.