Colonial Savings, F.A. v. Hayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Colonial Savings, F.A. v. Hayes

378 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 3954427, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 11, 2012·No. No. ED 97469·Published

Opinion

[385] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Byron Hayes, appeals pro se from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Colonial Savings, F.A. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.160b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[385] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Byron Hayes, appeals pro se from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Colonial Savings, F.A. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.160b).

Colonial Savings, F.A. v. Hayes, 378 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 3954427, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

378 S.W.3d 384 (Colonial Savings, F.A. v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.