Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
419 U.S. 819, 95 S. Ct. 35
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle. Read the opinion of the Court — 421 U.S. 100 →
Opinion
Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 417 U. S. 966.] Motion of Chapman L. Sanford to permit Whit M. Cook II, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 419 U.S. 819, 95 S. Ct. 35 (1974).
419 U.S. 819 (Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.