Colonial Penn Insurance v. Martich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Martich

260 A.D.2d 378, 687 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 378 (Colonial Penn Insurance v. Martich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Martich, 260 A.D.2d 378, 687 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated April 2, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, without a hearing on the issue of whether the offending vehicle was insured at the time of the accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the joinder of the proposed additional respondents Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Bryan R. Schretzmayer, and for a hearing on the issue of whether the offending vehicle was insured at the time of a June 4, 1997, accident.

The petitioner contends that the termination of coverage by the proposed additional respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty) effective May 15, 1997, was not effective with respect to the claim made by the respondent Jorge Martich arising out of a June 4, 1997, accident because Liberty failed to file a notice of cancellation with the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles within 30 days of the purported date of termination of the insurance policy (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 [2] [a]; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Vidale, 207 AD2d 489; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Bethel, 207 AD2d 449). However, if the insurance policy had been in force for at least six months, Liberty would not have been required to file a notice of termination with the Commissioner, and the policy would have been effectively terminated as of the date of the accident (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 [2] [a]; Matter of Hanover Ins. Co. [Velez], 207 AD2d 663). Thus, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for a hearing on this issue. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Gold-stein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated April 2, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, without a hearing on the issue of whether the offending vehicle was insured at the time of the accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the joinder of the proposed additional respondents Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Bryan R. Schretzmayer, and for a hearing on the issue of whether the offending vehicle was insured at the time of a June 4, 1997, accident.

The petitioner contends that the termination of coverage by the proposed additional respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty) effective May 15, 1997, was not effective with respect to the claim made by the respondent Jorge Martich arising out of a June 4, 1997, accident because Liberty failed to file a notice of cancellation with the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles within 30 days of the purported date of termination of the insurance policy (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 [2] [a]; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Vidale, 207 AD2d 489; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Bethel, 207 AD2d 449). However, if the insurance policy had been in force for at least six months, Liberty would not have been required to file a notice of termination with the Commissioner, and the policy would have been effectively terminated as of the date of the accident (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 [2] [a]; Matter of Hanover Ins. Co. [Velez], 207 AD2d 663). Thus, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for a hearing on this issue. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Gold-stein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 378, 687 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonial-penn-insurance-v-martich-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack