Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant

701 A.2d 340, 243 Conn. 919, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 353
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 24, 1997·No. SC 15778·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Royal Insurance Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 558 (AC 15518/15519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (a) (2), and Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasion, 219 Conn. 764 (1991), the signature of the defendant, D. Eugene Bryant, was sufficient to render the reduction in coverage form effective as to him; and (2) the subsequent amendment to § 38-175c (a) (2), and codified at General Statutes § 38a-336 (a) (2), clarified § 38-175c (a) (2), with retroactive effect?”

BERDON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant, 701 A.2d 340, 243 Conn. 919, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 353 (Colo. 1997).

701 A.2d 340 (Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant
714 A.2d 1209 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)