Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant

701 A.2d 340, 243 Conn. 919, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 353

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 24, 1997

DocketSC 15778

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 A.2d 340 (Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Bryant, 701 A.2d 340, 243 Conn. 919, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 353 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The Royal Insurance Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 558 (AC 15518/15519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (a) (2), and Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasion, 219 Conn. 764 (1991), the signature of the defendant, D. Eugene Bryant, was sufficient to render the reduction in coverage form effective as to him; and (2) the subsequent amendment to § 38-175c (a) (2), and codified at General Statutes § 38a-336 (a) (2), clarified § 38-175c (a) (2), with retroactive effect?”

BERDON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Royal Insurance Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 558 (AC 15518/15519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (a) (2), and Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasion, 219 Conn. 764 (1991), the signature of the defendant, D. Eugene Bryant, was sufficient to render the reduction in coverage form effective as to him; and (2) the subsequent amendment to § 38-175c (a) (2), and codified at General Statutes § 38a-336 (a) (2), clarified § 38-175c (a) (2), with retroactive effect?”

BERDON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 A.2d 340, 243 Conn. 919, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonial-penn-insurance-v-bryant-conn-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack