Colonial Optical Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Colonial Optical Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 449

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 19, 1956

DocketV. D. 29; Entry No. 11903

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 449 (Colonial Optical Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colonial Optical Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 449 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

These are valuation proceedings which arose by reason of judgments by the first division of this court in Colonial Optical Co. and Perryman, Mojonier Company et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 443, Abstract 58543; Prismatic, Inc., and James G. Wiley et al. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 379, Abstract 59078. By such judgments, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636), the matters were remanded to a single judge to “determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceedings before me have been abandoned by counsel for the plaintiffs. They are, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson, Judge:

These are valuation proceedings which arose by reason of judgments by the first division of this court in Colonial Optical Co. and Perryman, Mojonier Company et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 443, Abstract 58543; Prismatic, Inc., and James G. Wiley et al. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 379, Abstract 59078. By such judgments, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636), the matters were remanded to a single judge to “determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceedings before me have been abandoned by counsel for the plaintiffs. They are, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonial-optical-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack