Colonial Match Co. v. Fox

New York Supreme Court

Colonial Match Co. v. Fox

61 Misc. 532, 115 N.Y.S. 589

DecidedDecember 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Misc. 532 (Colonial Match Co. v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colonial Match Co. v. Fox, 61 Misc. 532, 115 N.Y.S. 589 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Goff, J.

Demurrer must be sustained. The stock sold did not belong to the plaintiff. Therefore there could not be damage sustained unless special causes intervened, and those causes would have to be pleaded in order to show special damage. There is no statement of fact showing damage to plaintiff because of such sale. An allegation “ That by. reason of the wrongful and unlawful acts of the. defendant as such trustee, etc. * * * plaintiff has been damaged ” is a mere conclusion. According to its terms, the trustee was vested with power to determine whether there was a breach of the agreement. If he “ wrongfully and unlawfully exercised this power and wrongfully and unlawfully sold the stock,” The Bonded and Security Company, the owner of the stock, may have a remedy for the wrong done. A common law action for damages is instituted against the defendant in his representative capacity. [533]*533If judgment followed the averments and prayer of the complaint, it would run against the trustee as such and be leviable on the corpus of the trust. When that is to be affected, the cestui que trust cannot he ignored. A trustee may not be liable in his representative capacity for his individual wrong in handling the trust.

Demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goff, J.

Demurrer must be sustained. The stock sold did not belong to the plaintiff. Therefore there could not be damage sustained unless special causes intervened, and those causes would have to be pleaded in order to show special damage. There is no statement of fact showing damage to plaintiff because of such sale. An allegation “ That by. reason of the wrongful and unlawful acts of the. defendant as such trustee, etc. * * * plaintiff has been damaged ” is a mere conclusion. According to its terms, the trustee was vested with power to determine whether there was a breach of the agreement. If he “ wrongfully and unlawfully exercised this power and wrongfully and unlawfully sold the stock,” The Bonded and Security Company, the owner of the stock, may have a remedy for the wrong done. A common law action for damages is instituted against the defendant in his representative capacity. [533]*533If judgment followed the averments and prayer of the complaint, it would run against the trustee as such and be leviable on the corpus of the trust. When that is to be affected, the cestui que trust cannot he ignored. A trustee may not be liable in his representative capacity for his individual wrong in handling the trust.

Demurrer sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Misc. 532, 115 N.Y.S. 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonial-match-co-v-fox-nysupct-1908.