Colonial Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Department of Administration

West Virginia Court of Claims

Colonial Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Department of Administration

21 Ct. Cl. 136

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 2, 1996

DocketCC-96-367

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 136 (Colonial Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Department of Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colonial Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Department of Administration, 21 Ct. Cl. 136 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $1,963.22 for automobile repair services provided to the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted invoices for the services with its Notice of Claim. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $1,852.10, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which this amount could have been paid. The difference between the amount claimed and the amount admitted represents sales tax which should not have been added to the cost of the repairs. Subsequently, the claimant contacted the Court and indicated it would accept $1,852.10 as full satisfaction for the claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $1,852.10.

Award of $1,852.10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $1,963.22 for automobile repair services provided to the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted invoices for the services with its Notice of Claim. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $1,852.10, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which this amount could have been paid. The difference between the amount claimed and the amount admitted represents sales tax which should not have been added to the cost of the repairs. Subsequently, the claimant contacted the Court and indicated it would accept $1,852.10 as full satisfaction for the claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $1,852.10.

Award of $1,852.10.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonial-ford-lincoln-mercury-inc-v-department-of-administration-wvctcl-1996.