Colonial Discount Co. v. Bures
154 A. 631, 107 N.J.L. 374, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 169
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirm,anee — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Boline, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colonial Discount Co. v. Bures, 154 A. 631, 107 N.J.L. 374, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1931).
154 A. 631 (Colonial Discount Co. v. Bures) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey
165 A.2d 297 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey
158 A.2d 712 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Budget Corp. of America v. DeFelice
135 A.2d 31 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)