Colonial Cooperative Insurance v. Bailey
This text of 177 A.D.2d 966 (Colonial Cooperative Insurance v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment seeking a declaration that it is not required to defend and indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action. Plaintiff urges that, as a matter of law, the incident resulted from the use or maintenance of a motorized vehicle and thus is within the policy exclusions. We disagree. A jury could find that the proximate cause of the fire was the negligent placement of a wood stove near a volatile substance or the act of Charles Bailey in throwing his gasoline-soaked jacket to the floor of the garage.
All concur, except Pine and Davis, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.D.2d 966, 577 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonial-cooperative-insurance-v-bailey-nyappdiv-1991.