Colonel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Colonel v. State

724 So. 2d 1261, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 615, 1999 WL 29202

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 27, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1721

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 724 So. 2d 1261 (Colonel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colonel v. State, 724 So. 2d 1261, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 615, 1999 WL 29202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion as untimely and successive. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring-appellant from filing any further pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion as untimely and successive. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring-appellant from filing any further pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 So. 2d 1261, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 615, 1999 WL 29202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colonel-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack