Colone, Joseph Kenneth

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 2018
DocketAP-77,073
StatusPublished

This text of Colone, Joseph Kenneth (Colone, Joseph Kenneth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colone, Joseph Kenneth, (Tex. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,073

JOSEPH KENNETH COLONE, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 10-10213 IN THE 252 ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JEFFERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

The above-styled and numbered cause is pending before this Court as a result of

appellant’s capital murder conviction and resulting sentence of death in the 252 nd Judicial

District Court of Jefferson County, Cause No. 10-10213, styled The State of Texas v.

Joseph Kenneth Colone. Appellant has filed in this Court a motion entitled “Motion to

Abate Appeal and Remand for Completion and Correction of Appellate Record.”

In his motion, appellant requests “copies of the juror information cards and

questionnaires in this case.” Appellant should first present his request for the disclosure Colone – 2

of this information to the trial court. See T EX. C ODE C RIM. P ROC. Art. 35.29.

Appellant further lists numerous other items that he contends are missing from the

appellate record.1 Because the trial court is in a better position to determine the accuracy

of the record, we abate the appeal and remand this cause to the trial court to resolve this

issue. The trial court is directed to make findings of fact regarding whether the items in

question have been omitted from the record, and if so, whether they should be included.

If the trial court determines that certain items need not be included in the record, then the

trial court should state its reasons for making that determination. If the trial court

determines that any relevant items have been omitted from the clerk’s record or reporter’s

record, then the trial court shall direct the clerk and/or court reporter to prepare, certify,

and file in this Court a supplemental record containing the omitted items. See T EX. R.

A PP. P. 34.5(c)(1) & 34.6(d).

The findings shall be made and any necessary supplements shall be filed within 30

days of the date of this order. Appellant’s brief will be due in this Court within 30 days

thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

Do not publish

1 Appellant contends that some of the missing items include “an 11.07 writ of habeas corpus filed pro se . . . a pro se Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Defendant’s Constitutional Right for Hybrid [R]epresentation among other pretrial motions.” From the limited information before us, it appears that at least the first two of these pro se motions would be separate habeas and mandamus proceedings and would therefore not be included in record in this direct appeal. However, we ultimately leave it to the trial court to make that determination on remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Colone, Joseph Kenneth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colone-joseph-kenneth-texcrimapp-2018.