Colon v. New York City Transit Police Department

114 A.D.2d 956, 495 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53994
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 A.D.2d 956 (Colon v. New York City Transit Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colon v. New York City Transit Police Department, 114 A.D.2d 956, 495 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

—In proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review determinations of the respondent New York City Transit Police Department terminating appellants’ employment as probationary New York City Transit Police officers, (1) petitioners Colon, Dillon, Bravo, Koehl and De Assis appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated May 8, 1984, which dismissed their proceeding, and (2) petitioner Farrell appeals from a judgment of the same court, also dated May 8, 1984, which dismissed his proceeding.

Judgments affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondent.

The instant petitions seeking the petitioners’ reinstatement to positions as New York City Transit Police officers were properly dismissed on the ground that they were time barred pursuant to CPLR 217. Special Term properly determined that the petitioners were advised of the initial 18-month probationary period within a week of their appointments in January and February 1982, respectively, when they received the Transit Police Academy students guide, and that any challenge to the validity of the 18-month period had to have been commenced within four months after they were so informed. Special Term also properly determined that the petitioners’ challenge to the respondent’s six-month extension of their probation period was also barred by the Statute of Limitations, inasmuch as the extension occurred in July and August 1983, and petitioners did not commence the instant proceedings until March 1984 (see, Matter of Martin v Ronan, 44 NY2d 374). O’Connor, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Dyke v. New York State Department of Education
144 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Caminiti v. New York City Transit Authority Police Department
125 A.D.2d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D.2d 956, 495 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colon-v-new-york-city-transit-police-department-nyappdiv-1985.