Colombi v. Silver

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 347
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 10, 1964
DocketNo. 38305
StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 347 (Colombi v. Silver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colombi v. Silver, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 347 (Ohio 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Both in the argument on the motion to certify and in the argument of this case on the merits, the principal question raised was the propriety of counsel for appellee including in his argument to the jury what is commonly referred to as the per diem method of evaluation of damages for pain and suffering. However, an examination of the bill of exceptions shows that that question is not before us.

An examination of the other errors assigned by appellant shows they are not well taken, and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colombi-v-silver-ohio-1964.