Colodney v. Sebelius
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1179
NATHAN J. COLODNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01026-JFM)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan J. Colodney, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nathan J. Colodney appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his employment discrimination complaint against the
Department of Health and Human Services. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Colodney v. Sebelius,
No. 1:09-cv-01026-JFM (D. Md. filed Dec. 9, 2010, entered Dec.
10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colodney v. Sebelius (Colodney v. Sebelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.