Collura v. Collura

212 N.E.2d 855, 350 Mass. 760
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 212 N.E.2d 855 (Collura v. Collura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collura v. Collura, 212 N.E.2d 855, 350 Mass. 760 (Mass. 1965).

Opinion

This is an appeal by the prevailing party in an uncontested divorce case in which he was the libellant. His libel was based upon cruel and abusive treatment and adultery. The judge refused to hear evidence upon the latter ground and entered a decree nisi upon the former ground alone. Ho harm to the libellant appears. The provision for preserving dower or curtesy rights subsequent to a divorce for adultery was repealed by St. 1949, e. 76, § 2, amending G. L. c. 208, § 27. The granting of a divorce for adultery is not an indirect adjudication of legitimacy. Sayles v. Sayles, 323 Mass. 66, 69. There would be no collateral estoppel to raise the issue of adultery in any later litigation to which it would be material. See Cambria v. Jeffery, 307 Mass. 49, 50; Henchey v. Cox, 348 Mass. 742, 746-747. There was no error in any respect.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henchey v. Cox
205 N.E.2d 715 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)
Cambria v. Jeffery
29 N.E.2d 555 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Sayles v. Sayles
80 N.E.2d 21 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 N.E.2d 855, 350 Mass. 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collura-v-collura-mass-1965.