Collis v. Bank of America National Ass'n

Fourth Circuit

Collis v. Bank of America National Ass'n

470 F. App'x 102

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2012·No. No. 11-2100·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Torina A. Collis appeals the district court’s September 7, 2011, text order denying her motion for relief from the district court’s July 20, 2010, final order. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Collis’ Fed.R.Civ. P.R. 60(b) motion. Eberhardt v. Integrated Design & Constr., Inc., 167 F.3d 861, 869 (4th Cir.1999) (stating standard of review). We grant Collis’ motion to seal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Torina A. Collis appeals the district court’s September 7, 2011, text order denying her motion for relief from the district court’s July 20, 2010, final order. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Collis’ Fed.R.Civ. P.R. 60(b) motion. Eberhardt v. Integrated Design & Constr., Inc., 167 F.3d 861, 869 (4th Cir.1999) (stating standard of review). We grant Collis’ motion to seal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Collis v. Bank of America National Ass'n, 470 F. App'x 102 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

470 F. App'x 102 (Collis v. Bank of America National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.