Collis v. Bank of America

364 F. App'x 819
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2010·No. No. 08-2058·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Torina A. Collis filed a civil action alleging she was terminated in violation of the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1514A' (West Supp.2009). Collis appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment, for reasons stated from the bench, in favor of the Defendant. Accordingly, we affirm. See Livingston v. Wyeth, Inc., 520 F.3d 344, 351 (4th Cir.2008) (discussing elements needed to establish a retaliation [820]*820claim under the Act). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collis v. Bank of America, 364 F. App'x 819 (4th Cir. 2010).

364 F. App'x 819 (Collis v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Livingston v. Wyeth, Inc.
520 F.3d 344 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)