Collins v. Winkley-Collins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collins v. Winkley-Collins

501 S.W.3d 496, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1016, 2016 WL 5888937

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 11, 2016

DocketWD 79184

StatusPublished

This text of 501 S.W.3d 496 (Collins v. Winkley-Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. Winkley-Collins, 501 S.W.3d 496, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1016, 2016 WL 5888937 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM

Michael Collins appeals from the judgment modifying the child custody and child support provisions of his marital dissolution from Terrie Winkley-Collins. Appellant contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to reopen the evidence, denying his motion to seal the judgment, and ordering the parties to be jointly and severally liable for guardian ad litem fees. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a formal, published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM

Michael Collins appeals from the judgment modifying the child custody and child support provisions of his marital dissolution from Terrie Winkley-Collins. Appellant contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to reopen the evidence, denying his motion to seal the judgment, and ordering the parties to be jointly and severally liable for guardian ad litem fees. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a formal, published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 S.W.3d 496, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1016, 2016 WL 5888937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-winkley-collins-moctapp-2016.