Collins v. Winkley-Collins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collins v. Winkley-Collins

501 S.W.3d 496, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1016, 2016 WL 5888937

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2016·No. WD 79184·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM

Michael Collins appeals from the judgment modifying the child custody and child support provisions of his marital dissolution from Terrie Winkley-Collins. Appellant contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to reopen the evidence, denying his motion to seal the judgment, and ordering the parties to be jointly and severally liable for guardian ad litem fees. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a formal, published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM

Michael Collins appeals from the judgment modifying the child custody and child support provisions of his marital dissolution from Terrie Winkley-Collins. Appellant contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to reopen the evidence, denying his motion to seal the judgment, and ordering the parties to be jointly and severally liable for guardian ad litem fees. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a formal, published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Collins v. Winkley-Collins, 501 S.W.3d 496, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1016, 2016 WL 5888937 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

501 S.W.3d 496 (Collins v. Winkley-Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.