Collins v. Titusville Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Collins v. Titusville Bank

1 Walk. 194, 1874 Pa. LEXIS 257

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 2, 1874·No. No. 165·Published

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court below on November 2, 1874, in the following opinion :

Per Curiam.

The affidavits neither singly nor as a whole make out a sufficient defence.

It is not alleged that Collins Brothers are accommodation indorsers. One of the defendants in his affidavit fails to deny notice of the protest, notice to one partner being good as to all, and it is not averred that the bank did not take the note in the usual course of business and without consideration.

We discover no error in the record and the

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court below on November 2, 1874, in the following opinion :

Per Curiam.

The affidavits neither singly nor as a whole make out a sufficient defence.

It is not alleged that Collins Brothers are accommodation indorsers. One of the defendants in his affidavit fails to deny notice of the protest, notice to one partner being good as to all, and it is not averred that the bank did not take the note in the usual course of business and without consideration.

We discover no error in the record and the

Judgment is affirmed.

Collins v. Titusville Bank, 1 Walk. 194, 1874 Pa. LEXIS 257 (Pa. 1874).

Pincite

1 Walk. 194 (Collins v. Titusville Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.