Collins v. Superior Court

81 P. 509, 147 Cal. 264, 1905 Cal. LEXIS 390
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 1905
DocketS.F. No. 4350.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 81 P. 509 (Collins v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Superior Court, 81 P. 509, 147 Cal. 264, 1905 Cal. LEXIS 390 (Cal. 1905).

Opinion

BEATTY, C. J.

The petitioner asks this court,to issue its writ prohibiting the superior court from proceeding to try him upon an accusation presented in the form of an indictment, but which he contends is no indictment, because, as he alleges, it was presented by an illegal body, and does not, as. he contends, state facts constituting any offense of which the superior court has jurisdiction. We express no opinion upon either of these questions, or upon the propriety of issuing any writ, because we think the cause is not properly here. It is no doubt within our jurisdiction, if we chose to exercise it. But the constitution confers upon the newly created district courts of appeal the same power to issue writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, and habeas corpus that has been conferred upon this court, and since the charge laid,, or attempted to be laid, against the petitioner is bigamy, an offense within the jurisdiction of the district court of appeal by direct appeal from a judgment of conviction, we think it is to that court the petition for a writ of prohibition should have been addressed.

We desire in the outset to make a precedent to be followed *265 in like cases hereafter: When a ease is such that an appeal from the judgment of the lower court would properly be taken to the district court of appeal, a petition to prohibit the proceeding should be addressed to that court.

As to this proceeding, it is ordered, in pursuance of the authority conferred upon us by section 4 of article VI of the constitution, that the cause be heard and determined by the district court of appeal for the first district. The clerk will transmit the petition and brief of petitioner to the clerk of that court.

Lorigan, J., Angellotti, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bosworth v. Superior Court
300 P.2d 155 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Stroble v. Superior Court
215 P.2d 749 (California Court of Appeal, 1950)
Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Superior Court
167 P.2d 213 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Estate of Philippi
161 P.2d 1006 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
Wilson v. Tomalino
161 P.2d 1006 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
Waidley v. Superior Court
125 P.2d 507 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Bern Oil Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court
41 P.2d 939 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Frank v. Superior Court
41 P.2d 940 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Shewitt v. Superior Court
41 P.2d 941 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Foster v. Superior Court
41 P.2d 187 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Gunder v. Superior Court
279 P. 822 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Tannahill v. Superior Court
209 P. 77 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)
Reclamation District No. 108 v. Ash
208 P. 394 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)
Favorite v. Superior Court of Riverside Co.
184 P. 15 (California Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 P. 509, 147 Cal. 264, 1905 Cal. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-superior-court-cal-1905.