Collins v. Stockton
This text of 322 S.E.2d 368 (Collins v. Stockton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to this court’s grant of an application for interlocutory appeal, appellant-plaintiff appeals from the grant of appellee-defendant’s motion to open default and the denial of appellant’s motions to strike appellee’s answer and to enter default judgment.
After a careful review of the record, we find no basis for holding that the trial court abused its discretion in granting appellee’s motion [934]*934and in denying appellant’s. Copeland v. Carter, 247 Ga. 542 (277 SE2d 500) (1981). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 S.E.2d 368, 171 Ga. App. 933, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-stockton-gactapp-1984.