Collins v. State

161 S.W. 115, 72 Tex. Crim. 44, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 563
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 1913·No. No. 2769.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Upon proper complaint and information charging appellant with unlawfully practicing medicine without having and recording his license therefor, etc., appellant was convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and one day in jail.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to strike out what purports to be a statement of facts in this case, because not filed in the court below until more than twenty days after the adjournment of court. Under the many and uniform decisions of this court and the statute, the motion is sustained and said statement struck out. Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222, and cases cited. In the absence of a statement of facts, no question is raised that we can consider.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. State, 161 S.W. 115, 72 Tex. Crim. 44, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 563 (Tex. 1913).

161 S.W. 115 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1948