Collins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Collins v. State

1929 OK CR 541, 283 P. 579, 45 Okla. Crim. 292, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 556

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 30, 1929

DocketNo. A-7151.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 541 (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. State, 1929 OK CR 541, 283 P. 579, 45 Okla. Crim. 292, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 556 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on April 30, 1928, on a charge of maintaining a public nuisance, and each sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The appeal was lodged in this court August 23, 1928.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

*293 We have examined the record, and find that the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment. No jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on April 30, 1928, on a charge of maintaining a public nuisance, and each sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The appeal was lodged in this court August 23, 1928.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

*293 We have examined the record, and find that the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment. No jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 541, 283 P. 579, 45 Okla. Crim. 292, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.