Collins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Collins v. State

145 P. 1166, 10 Okla. Crim. 690, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 222

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 25, 1914

DocketNo. A-2132.

StatusPublished

This text of 145 P. 1166 (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. State, 145 P. 1166, 10 Okla. Crim. 690, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 222 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Joel Collins, was convieted of larceny of domestic animals, at the May, 1913, term of the district court of Marshall county and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of two years. The appeal was filed in this court on the 17th day of November, 1913: The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has abandoned the appeal and become a fugitive from justice and cannot now be made to respond to any judgment of this court. A satisfactory showing in support of the motion is attached thereto. It is the judgment of the court that the motion should be sustained and the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Joel Collins, was convieted of larceny of domestic animals, at the May, 1913, term of the district court of Marshall county and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of two years. The appeal was filed in this court on the 17th day of November, 1913: The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has abandoned the appeal and become a fugitive from justice and cannot now be made to respond to any judgment of this court. A satisfactory showing in support of the motion is attached thereto. It is the judgment of the court that the motion should be sustained and the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 P. 1166, 10 Okla. Crim. 690, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.