Collins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collins v. State

531 S.W.3d 125

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 2017·No. No. ED 104882·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Collins appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Collins appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Collins v. State, 531 S.W.3d 125 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

531 S.W.3d 125 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.