Collins v. State

53 S.E. 193, 124 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 617
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

1. Where, on the hearing of a motion for a new trial, the mov-ant tenders affidavits as to certain newly discovered evidence, it is not error for the court to grant the solicitor-general time to procure an affidavit in rebuttal from a non-resident witness, and, after such affidavit is obtained, to consider it in passing upon that ground of the 'motion which is based on newly discovered evidence.

2. It js not cause for a new trial that the witness upon whose testimony the State relied has made, since the trial, a statement contradictory to his testimony. Jordan v. State, ante, 417.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. State, 53 S.E. 193, 124 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 617 (Ga. 1906).

53 S.E. 193 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rigsby v. State
1933 OK CR 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1933)