Collins v. State
123 So. 3d 654, 2013 WL 5538777, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15912
Opinion
Affirmed. See McDuffie v. State, 970 So.2d 312, 323 n. 2 (Fla.2007); Cooper v. State, 45 So.3d 490, 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (affirming trial court’s exclusion of reverse Williams rule evidence where the “similar fact evidence” “was overly general and did not meet the ‘close similarity of facts, a unique or fingerprint type of information’ test for relevancy”); Neals v. State, 972 So.2d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Collins v. State, 123 So. 3d 654, 2013 WL 5538777, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15912 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
123 So. 3d 654 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neals v. State
972 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
McDuffie v. State
32 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 763 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Cooper v. State
45 So. 3d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)