Collins v. State

87 So. 3d 821, 2012 WL 1605753, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7295
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 So. 3d 227
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2012·No. No. 2D11-2317·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Gary Collins appeals an order revoking his probation. His attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), but noted that the court revoked probation based in part on a violation not alleged. Counsel points out, and we agree, that the record indicates the court would have revoked probation based on the violation properly alleged and admitted by Collins. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentences, but we order the court to strike the reference to condition five in the order of revocation. See Lee v. State, 67 So.3d 1199, 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Affirmed with instructions.

SILBERMAN, C.J., and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. State, 87 So. 3d 821, 2012 WL 1605753, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7295 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

87 So. 3d 821 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Lee v. State
67 So. 3d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)